SCOUT
HISTORY
MILITARISM AND THE SCOUT
MOVEMENT.
by The Reverend Michael Foster SSC MIWO MIC
B-P Boy Scouts and Militarism.
In 1986 Allen Warren, a Field Commissioner of The Scout
Association renewed the debate in the English Historical
Review over the issue of militarism and the rationale
behind the origins of the Boy Scout scheme #1. Missing from
his survey of material was Sir Francis Vane's criticisms
and secession, and any assessment of the impact of the Vane
episode. Even Warren's contribution in concluding the
debate #2 still leaves us in the dark over the Vane
controversy. The omission is serious as it ignores
criticisms by a Scout Leader who worked for the very
organisation under discussion.
Later writers counterbalance Warren's omission. Tim Jeal's
biography on Baden-Powell published three years later,
devoted an entire sub-chapter to Vane, as well as
references elsewhere on the impact that the Vane rebellion
had on the developing scout scheme #3. More recently Robert
MacDonald in "Sons of the Empire" recognises that "the
quarrel [with Vane and the British Boy Scouts] left scars"
on B-P's organisation #4. Warren is not an isolated figure,
all previous biographies on Baden-Powell and all Scout
histories written by members of the Boy Scouts/Scout
Association, have been remarkably scarce in their details
of Vane and the British Boy Scouts as a parallel
organisation in direct competition. Almost, as in a
conspiracy of silence, the Vane rebellion is played down as
a minor episode or non-event. This article seeks to
question Vane's role as a critic in the issue of militarism
and the Boy Scout movement.
The British Boy Scouts were founded in May 1909 as a
small schismatic organisation and formed from the Scout
troops of the Battersea District. The British Boy Scouts
gained sponsorship in the form of a weekly page in the
boy's paper 'Chums', and through this expanded to almost
every part of the United Kingdom. Initially disgruntled by
the autocracy of the B-P HQ, they became reconciled, as an
affiliated organisation in October 1909, through assurances
given by Sir Francis Vane, then B-P's London Commissioner.
In November 1909, the BBS Troops had seceded again in
support of Sir Francis Vane who was sacked by Baden-Powell
over arguments about the bureaucracy and militarism of
Baden-Powell's Headquarters staff. With Vane as leader,
early 1910 the BBS formed the National Peace Scouts, an
alliance with the Boys' Life Brigade.
By 1911 the BBS existed, or was allied to Scout
organisations, in 12 other Countries. It is certain that
Vane's World Scouts worried the B-P organisation #5. What
began as a few troops in London led, for a short period, to
worldwide competition. The downfall of 'The Order of World
Scouts' owed itself to Vane becoming a bankrupt with the
BBS shrinking to a small domestic organisation.
Historians such as John Springhall cite Vane's
criticisms as evidence of militarism within B-P's
organisation in the formative years of the movement.
Crucial to the position of Sir Francis Vane in his role as
leader of the British Boy Scouts is the question 'were the
B-P Scouts military or not ?'
The answer would help us to judge whether Vane was
justified in strengthening a once reconciled scout
organisation and turning it into a rival organisation in
opposition to the B-P Scouts.
Scout historians from within the B-P Scout movement have
always sought to put to rest the accusation that B-P's Boy
Scouts were militaristic, and smooth over B-P's political
bias #6. If their views are correct, Vane's criticisms were
wrong and he was solely an egotist seeking power.
One of the more recent books to be published deals with the
criticism of militarism in three simple sentences; "Some
people reproached the Movement for being militaristic.
Others said it was overtly pacifistic. The two extremes
just about cancelled each other out." #7
Not only is the argument trivial, it also lacks in
originality and is dependent upon an argument framed by
Baden-Powell and preserved by Reynolds; "The Scouts
Association may well be grateful to the anonymous 'Cadet
Officer' who has pointed out that the Movement has got into
the hands of Pacifists as this will tend to dissipate the
accusation made that it is in the grip of Militarists." #8
Those who accused the organisation of militarism would
include Vane and the Captain who suggested that the Boy
Scouts had been captured by the military in the booklet
'The Boy Scout Bubble' #9.
Posterity provides no evidence of the former complainant.
Two possibilities could account for this omission. At least
one biographer gives a suggestion that B-P could invent
correspondence #10. The second is that there was a scout
movement that had been 'captured' by the pacifists, and
that was the British Boy Scouts led by Vane. The Cadbury
Family had been connected for a short period with B-P's
organisation, recruited by Vane and left when Vane was
sacked to strengthen the BBS with Vane. If the Cadburys
form the substance of the criticism by the anonymous Cadet
Officer, their potential for apologetics was short-lived
and in fact reversed.
What is undeniable, setting aside the judgments of the historians, B-P's contemporaries were not happy about the militaristic leanings of the Baden-Powell movement, hence the criticism voiced in the media, a severe schism, and the emergence of other offshoots, decidedly anti-militaristic.
Boy Scouts & Militarism.
From the start there was criticism about the Boy Scout
movement and whether it was military or not. Sir Francis
Vane took on the critics with correspondence in the 'Times'
#11 defending the movement, but only two months later was
ousted from B-P's Scouts over the issue of the emerging
organisation for the London districts. Vane was concerned
about the lack of democracy and pro-militarism. The
accusation that B-P's Scouts were military, rests on
several questions. In addition the matter becomes more
involved as the role of the critics was crucial for a
movement that sought public approval. This article explores
six questions in its discussion;
A - What was the rationale behind B-P's scheme?
B - How significant is the presence of militarists (Army
personnel, National Service League members, Legion of
Frontiersmen members)?
C - Was there direct involvement of scouts in military
preparations?
D - Did the Scout scheme seek to generate interest in the
Army and Navy?
E - How military would the movement have been if there was
no criticism?
F - How important is the chronology of the boy scout
history?
We can further compound the issue by asking what is meant by militarism. Baden-Powell's main definition when turning to apologetics for the scout movement rests on a simplistic use of the term. Militarism meant military drill, and since the scouts did not go in for military drill they were not military #12. Allen Warren turns to a technical definition and seeks to commend criteria set by a Professor Best #13.
According to Best, a society is military;
1) Where the Militaristic Class itself has a prominent
function within society's civic institutions.
2) Where the Army its role and functioning is a substantial
public issue.
3) Where typical military values of honour duty discipline
and obedience are highly and widely valued amongst citizens
at large.
Although this test refers to making a judgment on a
society as a whole, different results can be yielded by
applying the test to society as a whole and examining
society's effect on the emerging scout movement, or by
applying the test to the scout movement as a society within
itself. Warren's methodology is restricted to the former.
Whilst Britain as a society may not have been as military
as other European States in the Edwardian period #14, not
to be ignored are the aspirations towards this by the
pro-militarists.
As to British society, the historian may not be concerned
with the first part of the test #15, ie. Britain was not a
military state governed and run by the military. However,
if the B-P Scouts are considered as a society, then the
presence of military officers is significant. The founder
and many principal officers were military men. Also from
the beginning of the organisation until May 1910, B-P was
still in the pay of the Army. The military and their role
and influence within Scouting was an issue amongst members
of the Scout movement.
Whatever technical definitions we may wish to employ, we
must consider the contemporary culture. Rosenthal points
out in his study of Baden-Powell and the origins of the
Scout movement; "Whatever was meant by militarism - and
everyone had a different idea - it was important to large
numbers of people that the Scouts not be guilty of it and
most importantly to Baden-Powell himself" #16.
Rosenthal goes on to quote Baden-Powell's awareness
of the issue and its implications and impact on the
movement; "The Boy Scout movement is non-military... That
fact appeals to a very large number of parents...
Anti-military parents will allow their sons to join the Boy
Scouts but prohibit them from joining a Cadet Corps"
#17.
A. The rationale behind B-P's scheme.
Warren accuses the historians of a bias consisting of a
concentration of what is seen by him as an envelope of
B-P's social comment. He argues that B-P's main aim
was the core element of a boys' training scheme #18.
Against this it can be argued that B-P's social comment,
outlined the needs he saw in the training of youth, these
needs being the rationale for his scheme. The training
scheme for boys becomes the remedy. Warren also points out
that some of the material in 'Scouting for Boys', B-P
addressed to adults, and a concentration on this material
by the critics distorts its true bias ie, scouting for
boys. However, modern critics only echo voices raised in
the Edwardian period. There was from the outset, a concern
about the scheme, as to what was being inculcated in young
people, and contemporary scout leaders such as Vane
realised the romance and attraction about boys being scouts
and sought to redress the balance in favour of what he saw
as an educational scheme, hence the National Peace
Scouts.
Central to Warren's hypothesis is the argument that you
can identify and separate 'envelope' and 'contents'. The
complexity and ambiguity of the issues concerned may not
allow this neat separation. In introducing his article,
Warren points out a gap between the professed aims and
methods of the Boy Scouts, and the judgments of critical
historians #19. However, various aims can co-exist. The
scheme could aim at being character forming without
excluding militarism. It must also be considered that an
organisation may have professed aims but with a differing
reality. There is a further factor in examining the aims of
B-P in drawing up his scheme, largely contained in the
Scout Bible 'Scouting for Boys', that is the contribution
from others in the development and administration of the
scheme. In other words, whether it is true or not, that
B-P's motives for creating the Boy Scout scheme were
either, entirely civic, or entirely military, the issue is
further compounded by the fact that the emerging scheme
attracted leaders at headquarters level who's connection
with the pro-conscriptionists pressure group 'The National
Service League', left their motives open to question.
Both Martin Dedman and Tim Jeal tend to favour the civic
aims of B-P's Scouts as being a controlling factor in the
development of the scheme. In Dedman's PhD Thesis and Tim
Jeal's book examples are provided from various sources to
illustrate this #20. It can be observed that Baden-Powell
will have been happy in stressing the civil aims of
scouting (or habits of observation), but for someone in
B-P's position, that of being in military service and pay
from choice, training in citizenship was part of training
that would serve the aim of national defence. This for
Baden-Powell included a high morality. A pacifist would
press those same elements of training towards a different
direction, ie., the pacifist Boys Life Brigade pursued
training aimed at 'saving life'.
In other words, much of the training could be pressed
into service by both militarist and pacifist. The training
scheme could be held, as being neutral.
This brings us back to motives for implementing the scheme,
ie the material aimed at the adults. Those defending B-P
from charges of militarism would play down references
tending towards suggesting B-P's military motives. As an
example Tim Jeal suggests an early reference does not
highlight Baden-Powell's designs on any youth training
programme. "if you want to ensure peace let them see you
are prepared for war. ...Now is the time while enthusiasm
is still warm and before we sink back into our English easy
chair, for us to prepare a wise and practical organisation
of the splendid material lying ready to our hand."
Baden-Powell to his publisher in January 1901 #21. However,
this extract along with others of a similar nature led
William Adams to conclude; "There can, however be no doubt,
as is shown by the quotations from his writings already
made, that a very important motive in the formation of the
movement was the defence of the British Empire.." #22 Even
if quotations from other writings of B-P were not able to
supply us with any clue to his motives in creating a youth
training scheme, 'Scouting for Boys' has its own internal
evidence. Within the original presentation of the Scout
scheme there is the emphasis of developing the character
considered necessary for national defence (which in the
initial editions of 'Scouting for Boys' required training
in rifle shooting #23). Although the professed aim of B-P's
scheme was 'training in citizenship' was there an ulterior
motive ? and what is meant by citizenship ? According to
the scout training Baden-Powell aimed at boys, the ideal
citizen is at least someone who will be prepared to die for
their country. He urges his boy readership; "BE PREPARED to
die for your country if need be, so that when the moment
arrives you may charge home with confidence, not caring
whether you are going to be killed or not" #24. Note that
our moment of potential martyrdom is not one that results
from civil passive resistance, but active foray into
battle. Patriotism of a certain type (not uncommon for the
period) permeates 'Scouting for Boys' and therefore draws
comment from historians.
One thesis is that, due to the failure of the Earl of Meath's Lads Drill Association and of the Cadet clauses in Haldane's 1907 Territorial Bill (defeated by 190 votes), the Militarists turned their attention to infiltrating military styled youth movements to try to produce a nationally prepared force by more devious methods. If this were true we should not be surprised that it should meet criticism given the presence of concerned pacifists in that society. Patriotism and citizenship as expressed by Baden-Powell not only aimed at an adult audience, but that written for a young readership, would have its attractions for the militarist.
B. The presence of militarists.
In 1910 out of 250 Presidents and Commissioners, 140 were
classified as serving or retired military officers, 56 per
cent #25. By 1912 this had risen sharply. Out of 11 members
of the Executive Committee 5 were military officers and out
of 352 Presidents and Commissioners 247 or 70 per cent were
military officers #26. John Springhall's PhD Thesis deals
at length with the presence of prominent National Service
League members on the Scout Council; this membership would
re-enforce the charge of militarism. In the 'Patriot' Vol
III Oct 1910 #27, the Secretary of the West Essex Scouts
writes; "In one year one troop alone supplied thirteen
Territorial recruits. As there are 300,000 Scouts in the
country, the organisation is a possible recruiting ground
by no means to be despised." In 1921 when the League was
wound up it handed its assets of £12,000 to the Boy Scouts
Association as the body that most "successfully teaches the
ideals of citizenship of which Lord Roberts' scheme was a
part" #28. Other militaristic organisations also supported
the work of the scouts such as The Legion of Frontiersmen,
and in their official constitution was an injunction to
assist the Boy Scouts, with a footnote quoting Baden-Powell
stating that "members of the Legion of Frontiersmen are
greatly respected by all Boy Scouts" #29. Vane did not
directly blame B-P for what he saw as the movement's
military direction but saw "that the control of the
Baden-Powell's Boy Scouts has inevitably fallen into the
hands of his military advisers" #30.
Such support from organisations favouring militarism whilst not providing a direct link is bound to favour the thesis of the Scouts providing a 'front' for more overt military ambitions. Dedman counts Baden-Powell's employment with the Territorial Army as his siding with Haldane - a volunteerist, as opposed to the National Service League's conscriptionists, thus showing he "was opposed to the conscriptionist arguments of the N.S.L." #31 This reasoning is to play down the role of the NSL in the development of the scout scheme. Against Dedman is the probable fact that the reason for Baden-Powell accepting the Command of the Northumbrian Territorials is less doctrinaire than he allows for. Baden-Powell was unemployed, his Cavalry post having ended #32. Also B-P's employment prevented him from giving all of his time to the Boy Scout Scheme for the first year and a half of its life, leaving its leadership to appointed men some of whom were NSL members and would have influenced the emphasis and direction of the movement.
C. Direct involvement of scouts in military
preparations.
In 1909 Baden-Powell contemplated getting War Office
recognition after the Scouts were firmly established #33.
As late as 1916 Baden-Powell sought the War Office's help
in restricting the Scout uniform to his organisation,
involving some kind of 'recognition' by the War Office #34.
In 'Scouting for Boys' one chapter is devoted to
Marksmanship #35. In this chapter training in marksmanship
is equated with patriotism and our eventual target in the
advice offered by B-P is a 'man' #36. Future Editions were
to amend the target to that of an 'object'. Initially there
existed an option for Scout troops to register as cadet
corps #37 an option that drew criticism #38 and was
withdrawn #39. With the outbreak of the first world war B-P
mobilised the scouts as auxiliary assistance. Scouts
between fifteen and seventeen could receive special
training in shooting, signalling, entrenching and basic
infantry techniques #40. Such course of action avoided any
direct military connections.
However many, including men like Hargrave #41 failed to
appreciate the subtle difference between military training
taught by the Army and military training taught by the Boy
Scouts Association.
D. The B-P Scouts and a mirror image of the armed
forces.
For every branch of the armed forces there was established
a corresponding section within the Boy Scouts ,ie. Sea
Scouts in 1912 , then with the arrival of the second
world war, Air Scouts 1940. A section in 'Scouting for
Boys' was devoted to the Army and Navy #42; later editions
included more material on the various ranks in the services
before its total omission.
Whilst this is in keeping with other boy's literature of
the period, it does show the impact of imperialism and
would help generate interest in the armed forces. In
introducing this section B-P writes "we must be careful to
keep those Services supplied with good men" #43.
The Thesis built up so far from the discussion on the
six questions posed at the outset of this article in
relation to Vane and the BBS, is rehearsed as follows;
1) one of the motives for Baden-Powell's scheme of
'Scouting for Boys' was a concern for national defence.
This does not exclude other motives such as offering
character building or even an element of fun or adventure
for young people.
2) This 'national defence' ingredient in the scheme
attracted those who were military inclined, and saw the
organisation as furthering their cause.
3) The furthering of the scheme by such men caused a schism
early in the movements history, a schism that might have
proved more lasting and therefore more serious had the
rival organisation's main leader not become a bankrupt.
4) The schism was by 1911, on an international scale and
evidenced protest against Baden-Powell's emerging
organisation. Whilst the various members of the schismatic
organisation would have had varying motives for their
support of Vane's World Scouts, some criticisms were
directed at the feared militarism of Baden-Powell's
organisation. The remaining parts of the thesis awaits a
discussion on the role of the critics and the importance of
chronology;
5) This criticism voiced in the media caused Baden-Powell
to steer a middle course away from any overt militarism
that otherwise might have been allowed to continue.
6) The period under examination would also be critical. As
time progresses there was an identifiable shift in position
to more middle ideological ground, due to criticism.
E. The role of the Critics.
There was a debate in the Late Victorian/Edwardian Period
about the influence of militarism within youth
organisations, hence the creation of pacifist alternatives,
and the strength of opinion in society of that period was
probably responsible for avoiding overt militarism found
elsewhere. B-P sought to gain a wide acceptance of his
youth training methods which would aid national defence,
hence his courting of Smith and the Boys' Brigade to form a
single organisation. He was sensitive to the critics. B-P
realised that if the Scouts were seen as a military
organisation many parents would refuse to let their sons
join #44. Yet the presence of military officers in his
organisation, and certain comments to be found in 'Scouting
for Boys' tended to support the critics.
The further strengthening of the British Boy Scouts by
Vane's leadership and its attendant publicity - the
creation of 'The National Peace Scouts' focused many
peoples fears about the B-P Scouts. The pressure on B-P
over this issue would have begun in December 1909 when Vane
assumed leadership of the BBS. In February 1910 the
launching of the National Peace Scouts would have applied
further pressure. In 1910 the BBS saw further expansion
throughout the Empire. By May 1910 the membership figure
claimed for the BBS was 50,000, half that of B-P's
organisation. By 1911 Vane had founded Scout organisations
in Italy and France and forged alliances with organisations
in the USA and South Africa.
It would be extremely difficult to deny any influence on
the stance of B-P's organisation towards militarism. How
military would the movement have been if there had been no
criticism ? Baden-Powell's new Governing Council ,to
which Warren refers #45, was set up in reaction to the
events of the Vane episode. It was the creation of this
Council in December 1909 that brought H Geoffrey Elwes, a
Churchman and Solicitor into Scouting. The presence of
Elwes as a Christian philanthropist is cited both by Warren
and Jeal #46 as providing a counter-balance to the military
men. It must be noted that the widening of representation
from society at large, was a reaction to Vane's criticisms.
Vane knew the immense amount of good the Scout movement
could do, hence his part in the movement. Others such as
Elwes would recognise this as well, yet did not share
Vane's severe criticisms. Vane was not alone, as other
philanthropists such as J Howard Whitehouse and the Cadbury
Family did share Vane's misgivings. Whitehouse was once
considered by Baden-Powell as the potential Managing
Secretary for his movement. In 1910 he became Secretary to
the National Peace Scouts #47. In 1912, when Vane became a
bankrupt, Barrow Cadbury and C Brighton Rowntree did not
join their troops to the B-P organisation but instead
negotiated on behalf of British Boy Scout Troops with the
pacifist Boys Life Brigade to create the Boys Life Brigade
Scouts #48. Baden-Powell's organisation had failed to
convince the Quakers of their civic aims. Vane's worries
about the influence of militarism seemed justified.
Further approaches to B-P were made by Vane after the first world war in connection with the Scouts in Italy, where he had been involved with Scouting as founder since 1910. Vane sought to secure international relationships for the largest group of Italian Scouts. his plea was rejected. Although the resurgence of militarism within the B-P organisation was easily obtainable, and the first world war as a national crisis giving sufficient excuse, the post war scout movement became better organised on an international level, bringing together scouts from countries that had previously been enemies, a development Vane could only applaud. B-P was less forgiving than Vane and never received his overtures with any enthusiasm.
Allen Warren's reasoned defence of B-P and the Boy
Scouts' Association, may not be entirely dispassionate and
it could be argued that it falls into the genre of
apologetics due to his membership of the organisation he is
defending. Warren softens the charge by questioning what is
meant by militarism and by re-examining Baden-Powell's
aims. Warren's omission of the Vane episode was noted both
by Anne Summers and John Springhall in their replies to
Warren #49. Warren's defence in discounting Vane, is that
Vane had pioneered a Cadet Corps in the 1880s and that he
sought a reconciliation with Baden-Powell more than once
#50. As Warren was afforded the final comment in the debate
he initiated, no further room was provided in the English
Historical Review to rescue Vane.
Vane had indeed been involved in founding and running for a
short while a Cadet Corps both in the East End of London
and at Karree in South Africa in 1901 #51. Vane had come to
view the cadet movement as being "obsolete in the new era"
and saw a greater potential in the scout movement for
internationalism #52.
It is significant to note that in Vane's first attempt at
reconciliation in May 1911, he sought a position once
previously offered in the foreign section. It was in the
internationalism of the movement where Vane saw its
greatest potential as a force for peace. By May 1911 the
Boy Scout Association would be cautious to be involved in
any venture that would substantiate any charge of
militarism, and this would include Haldane's Cadet scheme.
Vane through the BBS had made his point.
F. Chronology.
In examining the charge of militarism in connection with
B-P's organisation, chronology is an important factor. What
may be true of the post Edwardian Scout Association (Boy
Scouts Association pre 1967), should not be read back into
the past especially the foundation years. There was a shift
in presentation of the scheme, in relation to the critics,
which could be dated to 1910 onwards. Tim Jeal suggests
that the years from 1902 to 1909 give a better indication
of B-P's original purposes, and that Warren concentrates
his material from 1911 - 1920 #53. In the intervening
period between Jeal's two sets of dates, Baden-Powell's
movement was occupied with a rival movement, the existence
of which, was evidence of criticism.
It would be difficult to deny any influence of the Vane
schism on the ongoing development of Baden-Powell's
movement. Martin Dedman suggests that Baden-Powell's scheme
for the Boys Brigade 1904/1906 is evidence of citizenship
(and therefore non-military) training #54. As Dedman is
aware, the Boys Brigade scouting scheme of 1904/1906 was
not a complete scheme #55 but only a proficiency subject.
Also to be noted is the fact that the Boys Brigade
undertook drill and used dummy rifles in their training.
Baden-Powell was aware of the existing nature of Boys
Brigade training which in its day was considered military
hence the pacifist alternative of the Boys Life Brigade
founded by John Paton in 1899. B-P offered scouting to add
to the appeal of the Boys Brigade.
It is also no surprise that in dealing with the post 1911
period of the scout scheme that Dedman can point out that
the Italian educationalist Dr M Montessori was happy about
adopting Scout training in an educational experiment in
Holland in 1939 and this would have not obtained if
scouting were "a scheme for military training" #56. In the
first place, Montessori would have learnt about the Scouts
influenced by Vane's Italian Peace Scouts, and in the
second place after the Vane crisis, B-P's organisation
occupied a politically middle ground.
Conclusion.
The Boy Scout scheme whilst it may have been born out of a
concern for the Empire as well as a genuine desire to help
young people, owes its success to its ability to have
balanced the influences of the period and steered to more
middle ground and hence to gain a wider influence. The
critics surely played a major role in this. A shift in
position towards that of a non-military organisation can be
demonstrated by a simple comparison of one of the later
editions of 'Scouting for Boys', with the earlier editions
#57. Thus in conclusion ,Vane was justified in alerting
both the public and members of the scout movement to the
potential dangers of militarists steering the movement in
the wrong direction. Through Vane's rebel organisation,
change was effected to B-P's organisation from without, a
change that was necessary to ensure the organisation's long
tern survival. Yet the irony is that this process left
Vane, who had caused the change, out in the cold.
REFERENCES.
#1 Sir Robert Baden-Powell, the Scout movement and citizen
training in Great Britain 1900-1920, Allen Warren, English
Historical Review Vol CI No 399 April 1987. (Warren B-P
Debate).
#2 Baden-Powell: a final comment, Allen Warren, English
Historical Review October 1987 Pages 948-950. (Warren,
Final Comment).
#3 Tim Jeal, Baden-Powell, Hutchinson 1989. The Vane
Rebellion Pages 404-409. Also Pages 428,544 and 545.
#4 Robert H MacDonald, Boys of the Empire, University of
Toronto Press 1993. Page 181.
#5 Jeal, B-P, Page 428.
#6 see; E K Wade, The Piper of Pax, Pearson 2nd Ed 1931,
page 163. E E Reynolds, The Boy Scout Jubilee, OUP 1957,
page 123. E E Reynolds, Baden-Powell, OUP 1st Edition 1942
pages 169-170. B-P's Scouts (An official History), Collins
1961, pages 59-62. John Sinclair, Charisma and the
Monolithic Nature of Scouting, SAGGA Journal - The Journal
of the Scout and Guide Graduate Association, April 1968.
Pages 2-3. Laszlo Nagy, 250 Million Scouts, Darnell 1985
page 68 etc,.
#7 Nagy, Page 68.
#8 Reynolds, B-P, 1st Ed, Page 170.
#9 Published in 1912.
#10 William Scovell Adams, Edwardian Portraits, Secker and
Warberg 1957. Page 136.
#11 The Times, London Sept 15th 1909 Page 7.
#12 Michael Rosenthal, Character Factory, Collins, 1986.
Page 194.
#13 Warren, B-P Debate, Page 378.
#14 Warren, B-P Debate, Page 378.
#15 Warren, B-P Debate, Page 378.
#16 Rosenthal, Character Factory, Page 191.
#17 Rosenthal, Character Factory, Page 192.
#18 "Most historians, in commenting on 'Scouting for Boys',
have tended to concentrate on this envelope of
socio-political attitudes and fads contained in the
sections of the book directed primarily at
adults,.........this interpretation of 'Scouting for Boys'
distorts its true bias, which is that it is about scouting
for boys..." Warren B-P Debate, Page 386f.
#19 Warren, B-P Debate, Page 376.
#20 Martin John Dedman, Economic and social factors
affecting the development of youth organisations for
civilian boys in Britain between 1880 and 1914, PhD Thesis
London School of Economics and Political Science,
University of London 1985. Chapter 6 passim. Jeal, B-P, see
pages 365/6 notes on B-P's Johannesburg Lecture. cf. pages
362 and 373. Note on Scouting and Militarism page 410/1.
#21 Adams, Portraits, Page 123. Also quoted by Jeal, B-P,
Page 340.
#22 Adams, Portraits, Page 137.
#23 B-P Scouting For Boys Fortnightly Part V (B-P SFB FP)
12th February 1908, Page 314.
#24 B-P SFB FP V 12th February 1908, Pages 331-332.
#25 Debate Baden-Powell and the Scout Movement before 1920:
Citizen Training or Soldiers of the Future, John Springhall
English Historical Review October 1987. Pages 939/940.
(Springhall, B-P debate).
#26 George Allen 1912 Page 8. These numbers are often
quoted ie Rosenthal, Character Factory, Page 206 & John
Springhall, Youth, Empire and Society, Croom Helm 1977.
Page 128. Warren seeks to play down the involvement of the
National Service League members to the role of supporters
of the movement as opposed to being involved in the running
of the movement - B-P Debate, Page 388.
#27 a National Service League Journal.
#28 Quoted in John Springhall, The Boy Scouts, Class and
Militarism in relation to British Youth Movements
1908-1930, International Review of Social History, Volume
XVI Part 2 1971. Page 137.
#29 Rosenthal, Character Factory, Pages 208-209.
#30 Sir Francis Vane bt, The Boy Knight, The Council of the
National Peace Scouts 1910. Page 19.
#31 Dedman PhD, Page 188.
#32 Jeal, B-P, Page 387.
#33 Rosenthal, Character Factory, Page 191.
#34 War Office 114/Misc/447 (C.I.) June 4th 1916.
#35 B-P SFB FP V 12th February 1908, Page 322.
#36 B-P SFB FP V 12th February 1908, Page 324 see Rosenthal
op cit Page 226f.
#37 Warren, B-P Debate, Page 391.
#38 see J Springhall PhD, Page 242. For a contemporary note
on such a Troop see The Boy Scout Bubble Pages 57-58. There
is also photographic evidence in 'The Boy Scout's Library'
Gail and Polden 1910 Vol X 'Cyclist Scout Training by a B-P
Scout' Photographs of Scouts with Carbines opposite
pages;8,28,44,45.
#39 Warren, B-P Debate, Page 391.
#40 Rosenthal, Character Factory, Page 228.
#41 John Hargrave was a member of the Boy Scouts
Association and was invalided out of the War in 1916. He
served as HQ Commissioner for Camping and Woodcraft. He was
a highly charismatic figure, and became a critic of the
militarism and bureaucracy of the organisation. He sought
to move scouting back to its woodcraft indian beginnings.
His criticism caused his ejection and he formed the short
lived 'Kibbo Kift'.
#42 see B-P SFB FP V 12th February 1908, Pages 328-330.
#43 B-P SFB FP V 12th February 1908, Pages 327-328f.
#44 Rosenthal, Character Factory, Page 191f.
#45 Springhall, B-P debate, Pages 934-942. Scouts, Guides
and VADs: a note in reply to Allen Warren Anne Summers,
English Historical Review October 1987 Pages 943-947.
#46 Warren, Final Comment, Page 949/950.
#47 The founding of a Cadet Corps by Vane in 1884 is well
established. For the Karree Cadet Corps see Vane, Agin,
Page 128.
#48 Vane, Agin, Pages 207-208.
#49 Warren, B-P Debate, Page 391
#50 Warren, Final Comment, Page 950, Jeal, B-P, Page 414.
#51 The Complete History of the British Boy Scouts
1909-1989, The Reverend Michael Foster, The Brotherhood of
British Scouts Aylesbury 1989, Page 9.
#52 The Complete History of the British Boy Scouts
1909-1989, The Reverend Michael Foster, The Brotherhood of
British Scouts Aylesbury 1989, Page 13.
#53 Jeal, B-P, Page 627, footnote 10 to Chapter nine.
#54 Dedman PhD, Pages 193-195.
#55 Dedman PhD, Page 194.
#56 Dedman PhD, Pages 210-211.
#57 23rd Edition, Pearson, 1961, 24th Edition, The Scout
Association 1967.
© Copyright: The Reverend Michael Foster 1997